This methodology stands in contrast to the so-called unit/plug rate approach to pricing, where estimators rely on historic pricing libraries to directly populate unit rates of a bid. The breakdown of the rate is clearly communicated. Resource requirements are stipulated, production rates are documented and wastage allowances are apparent.
Understanding the true cost of construction
Even though the scope of work is often quite similar from one project to the next, the cost of construction is still highly dependent on specific site conditions as well as the quality, availability and cost of a contractor’s resources.
An accurate estimate will need to account for these project/company-specific variances. This is easy to do when an estimate has been developed from first principles, because the rate breakdown can easily be inspected and revised, thereby ensuring that all resources and assumptions are valid and applicable.
However, adjusting historic estimates that are based on plugged unit rates can often be challenging and will rarely be accurate. This is because of the difficulty of gauging the impact that a specific variance might have on a unit rate, especially if the assumptions used to develop the original rate are not clear, to begin with.
Following a first principle approach will give you confidence in your final estimate by ensuring that all construction costs specific to your project are known and have been accounted for.
Standardizing operations & communicating assumptions
A well-defined estimate and project plan serve as a blueprint for project execution. Ensuring that all of the assumptions and decisions made during the pre-construction phase of a project are clearly documented and communicated to the on-site project team is of vital importance to ensure a project finishes on time and within budget.
First principle estimates have the advantage of being self-documenting and self explanatory. Resource requirements and allowances are apparent for each bid item, requiring minimal explanation or documentation to be executed according to spec.
Contrast this to the situation where the project team is provided with a high-level unit rate estimate only. Unless additional documentation is also provided, the on-site team will be relying on their own experience and estimates when allocating resources and monitoring production.
A well-defined first principle estimate, therefore, provides the on-site project team with a clear execution plan that will incorporate all assumptions and learnings of the pre-construction team.
Post tender budget management
Construction projects are often executed over a long time frame and with relatively thin profit margins. It is therefore imperative that cost control should be done on a continuous basis, rather than waiting for project closeout to assess profits or losses.
Effective cost control requires a system that will allow for the comparison of actual costs against budgeted expenditure at any point during the execution of a project. This process can be complex, as it requires data from cross-functional departments, each with its own reporting formats. Ensuring that your original project estimate is structured in a way that facilitates cost control will greatly simplify this process.
The resource-based structure of a first principle estimate is perfectly suited for cost control. Seeing that construction costs are typically incurred against resources (materials are purchased, equipment is hired, wages are paid, etc), a first principle estimate can be reverse engineered to produce budget allowances against these same resources - enabling an apples vs apples comparison.
Referring back to the plastering example, assume that 20m² of plastering has been completed one month into construction. By inspecting the original rate breakdown, we can easily calculate both the quantity and the budgetary allowance for each resource to date:
Allowed Quantities to Date:
General Labour = 20[m²]*3[workers]/25[m²/day] = 2.4 worker days
Plasterer = 20[m²]*1[workers]/25[m²/day] = 0.8 plasterer days
Mortar = 20[m²]*0.025[m³/m²]*1.15[%waste] = 0.575 mortar m³
Allowed Budget to Date:
General Labour = 2.4[days]*100[£/Day] = £240.00
Plasterer = 0.8[days]*150[£/Day] = £120.00
Mortar = 0.575[m³]*130[£/m³] = £74.75
For each of these resources, the actual quantity procured and the actual cost incurred should already be tracked in an organization’s accounting or ERP system. A detailed budget vs actual comparison could therefore be done on a continuous basis, highlighting potential production issues or resource wastages before they become serious issues.
This resource-driven approach to cost management is only possible if estimates are structured according to the first principle pricing methodology.
The advantages of the first principle estimating methodology should now be clear. By requiring estimators to perform a detailed study of a project’s resource requirements, whilst documenting all assumptions, the methodology not only provides highly accurate pre-construction estimates but also provides an execution blueprint for the operational team that can automatically form the basis of continuous cost control.
The high level of input and detail required to set up a first principle estimate might seem time-consuming and labor-intensive, but the final return on investment will far outweigh this initial effort.
Also, this burden can be alleviated to a large extent by making use of a specialized first principle estimating platform such as Lula Build, which provides advanced tooling to ease the process of setting up a first principle estimate, either from the ground up or by repurposing previous estimates. Detailed resource reporting is also supported out of the box, simplifying forecasting and cost control.
We will be posting several articles about first principle estimating in the coming months, so please stay posted! Learn more about Trimble's construction estimating software